Admissions Portal for prospective students

The University of Vermont 

Admissions portal for UVM

Project overview

Challenge

The Admissions Portal is a critical brand touch point for prospective students during their application journey with the University since all of Admissions communications with the student happens in the portal. The UX and design of the portal was clunky and not user-centric. It lacked interface clarity. It was hard to tell what was clickable and what was not. The level of support needed was considerable.

GOALS

The driving force of the new content strategy and design was to make this page student centric and easy to digest at a glance. Primarily, users go to this page for two reasons:

  1.  to know the status of their application
  2. and find out what their next steps are

Audience

Prospective students

Scope and Constraints

  • There were some guardrails that we bumped up against when working with the Slate platform including content organization, grid and breakpoints, styling, data population and personalization.

    My Role

    • UX Design
    • Product Design
    • User Journey Mapping
    • Design System

     

    Tools

    Figma (wireframe and prototyping)

     

    Link

    The Portal went live and was well received. It is not public facing as it holds sensitive student data.

     

    Issues with portal before the redesign

     

    before view of admissions portal with callouts for issues and problems

    01 Color coding

    The 13 difference statuses had a color coding that did not translate any useful meaning to the user- or to the team, for that matter.

    • Color had no significance or meaning tied to status
    • Use of color coding went against the “don’t make me think” rule
    • Color on its own to indicate status is not accessible

    02 Status and primary CTA are bundled

    • Primary Call to Action not recognized as a link
    • Urgent To Do right after congratulations feels bad (Congratulations! Now pay us)

    03 Available Actions list

    • Not recognizable as links – styling has no underline, icons or change of color
    • “Precious” centered-diamond setting looks more like a copyright notice for a novel

    04 Unregonizable buttons

    • These full-band heads are, believe it or not, actually buttons that have scaled to fill their container. They are not identifiable as interface elements.

    05 Financial Aid Call to Action

    • Button not identifiable as a UI element
    • This is a primary CTA that is not clear. 

    06 Account details too prominent

    07 Button label misleading

    • No confidence in the click. What Critical Letter?
    • If it is critical, why is it blending into the upper right corner?

    08 Awkward container width on desktop

    • 2/3rd width content container creates awkward content layouts and line lengths

    Solution: working with a design system

     

    The design of the portal rolled off really easily by working with Figma libraries and the Ivy design system I’ve authored for the university. It has created efficiencies in the design process, handoff and engineering. 

    I’ve started to extend the design system with web-safe typography guidelines for applying our brand to 3rd party web applications like the Slate Portal, the campus map, sign-on screens, email newsletters and others.

    Accomplishments

    Improved content hierarchy

    An applicant logging in to the portal wants to know the status of their application as well as what their next steps may be. The new design elevates critical content.

     

     

    UVM Admissions Portal<br />
    Admissions Portal clay, welcome screen

    Easy access to the admissions decision letter

    Finding out the results of your college application is an exciting moment. The number of help requests showed that prospective students were struggling with the old interface and were having a hard time finding their admissions letter. The links to view the letter were not easily identifiable as links.

     

    The new design elevates this content as well as has a very clear user interface to gain access to the letter.

    List of action steps for a prospective student applicant

    A ‘To Do’ list to help the applicant stay on top of things

    The typical applicant applies to 5-9 colleges. That’s a lot to keep track of! The portal provides clear next steps and To Do’s to help prospective students become enrolled students. The list is clear and engaging to interact with.

    A ‘To Do’ list to help the applicant stay on top of things

    The typical applicant applies to 5-9 colleges. That’s a lot to keep track of! The portal provides clear next steps and To Do’s to help prospective students become enrolled students. The list is clear and engaging to interact with.

    List of action steps for a prospective student applicant
    Admissions portal stats

    Measuring results

    As a UX designer, getting before and after analytics is essential to measuring results.

    Since the portal is behind an authentication wall, we were not able to use Google Analytics for usage data and had to rely on the analytics tools that came with the platform.

    The pie chart shown here is a 24-hour snapshot of activity. It’s a bit misleading as it combines browser and platform data and the labels are not clear. “iPad”, “Android” and “iPhone” are displaying mobile stats and the rest are desktop stats listed by brower.

     

    Indicators of success

    All prospective students have to use the portal, so usage is not related to usability. However, there are some other indicators of the success of the University’s admissions effort and the portal. Here are a few:

    • The number of help requests and questions from prospective students about the portal went down
    • The volume of applications received increased
    • The number of students admitted to the incoming class increased
    • The criteria for admissions (GPA, essay strength, standardized test scores) became more competitive

     

    Content strategy and wireframing

    The wireframes developed by the team’s content strategist were an important asset to communicate the content organization, hierarchy, and actions that the user could take.

    The clarity of the wireframes allowed me to translate high-level business requirements into an engaging UX. Working with the component library of the Ivy design system I created for the university, I was able to quickly identify the optimal display patterns and functionality that would provide the best user experience.

    Communicating application status

    Admissions Portal- icon for an 'in process' status

    Awaiting materials
    Awaiting decision
    Decision released

    Admissions Portal- icon for a 'waiting' status

    Wait list
    Offered wait list
    Application withdrawn

    Admissions Portal, icon representing acceptance and a positive outcome

    Enrolled
    Admitted
    Spring start admit
    Spring start enrolled
    Decision deferred

    Admissions Portal, icon communicating student is on a path but has not found their way yet

    Denied
    Closed out

    There are 13 different statuses that an applicant can have within their application journey. A longtime advocate for Steve Krug’s common sense “don’t make me think” approach to usability, I reduced the number of icons from 13 to 4. Rather than having an icon for each, I grouped statuses together into the above categories, greatly reducing the complexity of the icons.

    Communicating application status

    Admissions Portal- icon for an 'in process' status

    Awaiting materials
    Awaiting decision
    Decision released

    Admissions Portal- icon for a 'waiting' status

    Wait list
    Offered wait list
    Application withdrawn

    Admissions Portal- icon for an 'in process' status

    Enrolled
    Admitted
    Spring start admit
    Spring start enrolled
    Decision deferred

    Admissions Portal, icon communicating student is on a path but has not found their way yet

    Denied
    Closed out

    There are 13 different statuses that an applicant can have within their application journey. A longtime advocate for Steve Krug’s common sense “don’t make me think” approach to usability, I reduced the number of icons from 13 to 4. Rather than having an icon for each, I grouped statuses together into the above categories, greatly reducing the complexity of the icons.

    User journey mapping

    I employed user journey mapping to help better understand the applicant’s experience at different points of the process and reveal opportunities for us to improve it.

    Content can be tailored to work through pain points and blocks to improve their overall experience and the feeling of connection with the university.

    teen looking at mobile phone

    Nurturing the relationship

    The University’s business goal is to enroll qualified applicants and  provide an information path for unsuccessful candidates towards a potential successful application.

     

    The admissions journey is potentially a loop. An applicant who has been denied admission could conceivably reapply successfully at a future date. By delivering user-centric content that reflects their application status and goal of a positive outcome, we can form a better connection and meet them where they are at on their journey.

    You may also like

    Undergraduate Admissions mobile screen grabs

    Redesign of a higher-ed recruiting website

    Undergraduate Admissions site for The University of Vermont gets a makeover.

    Trail Mix design system teaser thumbnail

    Design system for a university

    Design system for The University of Vermont.

    Search interface design

    UI and visual design for the primary search interface on a higher education website.

    Seventh Generation marketing landing page teaser for baby care products

    Component-based marketing landing pages

    UX and design of marketing landing pages for Unilever’s B-Corp, Seventh Generation

    Sophie-pup and Susy

    Copyright Website 2024  |  Site Map  |  Credits